Responsibility

Taking responsibility for your actions is the right thing to do. If you do not take responsibility for your own actions you are just passing the blame down onto somebody else. Even if you unintentionally do something, you still need to take responsibility. If you just ignore your mistakes, you are not a very good person.
For example if you accidentally ran into a car and injured somebody, you should have to take responsibility for that. If you refused to help or pay for damages cause by your negligence that is selfishness and not right. One time i accidentally broke a window, so i payed for it. That is the right thing to do.

Money or Love

I would not marry for money for many different reasons. First of all that is just wrong. You don’t marry someone just for their money. You marry for love. I know many people that marry for money but I hate that. I like to work for my own money I don’t need my wife giving money to me. Money ruins many relationships. I know people who were very rich and they got divorced because they were fighting about money.

Money gets in between many people and it is not right. If you actually love someone and they happen to be rich that is a much different thing but if you just marry for money that is just wrong. Love is not a word that you should just throw around. First you start out by dating someone. Then, most people realize that they are rich and then they want to marry them, but the other person does not know that. If the other person actually knew that than they would not get married and they would not have to waste their time and waste their money on divorce. Divorce is a really expensive thing to go through and if you don’t have to worry about that than never get yourself into a relationship that is only money related and not love related.

Decisions

If I had to choose between family, and my husband, I don't think I could pick. I would try not to get into situations that are between my husband and family. I think that the only time I would get involved if it was life or death, or if it was something completly serious, like some one killed someone or if my husband was cheating on me and they had proof. But as far as I am conserned I would try to stay as neutral as possible. If it something that is not so serious, they will get over me not choosing a side, or just not getting involved. I love my family and I will love my husband too, and to me my husband is going to be part of the family. For me now if my brother comes up and says something about him getting in trouble, or something to do with my boyfriend, then I would talk to my boyfriend first because we are honest to each other no matter what the situation. I am most likely not going to believe me brother, unless told other wise, because he has not been honest with me practically for my whole life. But I would only listen to both sides before I even did anything, and if anything happened I would leave it between the two of them and not take it in myself. They are big boys. They can deal with it. I am not going to be dragged into something that really does not have anything to do with me.

Bonus Blog: Creepy Stalkers

Stalkers are like mosquitoes and pennies, they're every where and no one likes/wants them around. Like pennies, they are cast aside quite often. And when offered companionship, the stalker's victim will scoff at the thought, treating the wierdo like one of the aformentioned examples, "Get outta here ya stupid pennies!". Nothing good usually comes from stalkers, John Lennon had a stalker and look what happened to him. I show no support for stalkers in the real world and am frustrated to understand the level of insane that someone must be to get the picture, they don't like you, get over yourself you narcissist. As far as the "romantic" stalking goes in movies, well, movies are movies and books are books, you can't really trust them. It's the real life situations you hear about or go through that count, not what you saw on Oprah.

Bonus Blog FTW

1. I would marry for money.

I think this is most dishonest thing anyone can do in their lifetime. I know this from a family member, that it does happen a lot and that it can really hurt someone. My family member, has been married to three different men, and each of them had big sums of money. She had a kid with each, divorced them, and now gets a good half of their bank account each year. I despise her and think her morals are terrible, but I think she feels she has to gold-dig because she never went to college and now has to support 3 kids. She recently remarried her ex, and they are living happily in a mansion in East Woodstock. I'm sure that as soon as he starts losing money she is going to pack her bags. It's insane but it does happen!

I just feel that if you're going to marry someone it should be for who they are, not what they have. Unfortunately not everyone sees it that way. I'm sure there are a lot of families out there where the mother or father married the other for money. Hollywood is a good example, there are celebrities married to no-bodys. In the words of Kanye West, "I aint sayin she's a gold digga, but she and messin with no broke n***as."

<3 Special_k

Marryin' for Dough.

Would I marry for money? I would never marry for money. I feel like if I do that I would have to stay with them for the rest of my life, due to the fact that the person I am marrying will believe that I am in love with them, even though I would be lying the whole time. It is not really right to do that to someone, you should be honest with them at least and let them know that you do not love them. Imagine how your wife would feel if she found out you were just using her for the money, it just isn't right; after all you would grow some feelings for her after time of course. I would never marry for money. The purpose of marriage is to start a new beginning; a formal union of a man and a woman, typically recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife. When you become husband and wife, you state that you "love" each other. I would not want to do that to someone, because love is a strong word. If you are using that word to get money from your significant other than I believe it is messed up. Marrying for money is the wrong thing to do. A goal in life is t pursuit to be happy, and by lying your whole life and cheating in a relationship you will not be happy. It would be hard to live like that/live with yourself if you "married for money."

Cash Money

I personally would not ever marry someone just for their money. I would like to have the money but I would not want to have to deal with someone I dont really like just to have money. If they were ugly or something it does not matter how much money they had I would not mary them. I would rather be with someone I care about and be happy then be unhappy and have a lot of money. Also money can not fix everything so even if u have a lot of money it does not mean your going to be happy. When you are with someone you love and really care about you will be more happy than if you had a lot of money. Also if you are with someone you love you know that they will always be there for you and be happy with you. Marrying someone that is rich could be a bad decision because they might be doing it for the wrong reasons. You would have a lot of money but you would not have true love and trust and things like that. -Bieber Fever

I would marry for money? Naaaah.

The quote from The Great Gatsby, "I would marry for money" is a saying I deffinitley do not agree with. I would not actually just take the time to committ and marry someone just for their money. I mean sure sometimes having money isn't a bad thing, but I would honestly marry for love, not money.I feel that if I just married for money, our relationship would just be miserable and there would be nothing there except for money and material things, and when all the money is gone we would be bored, broke and miserable.
So if I was stuck in a situation in which someone had alot of money and they were attractive and we actually had a legit love for each other, I would consider marrying them because then I would get the best of both worlds. But never would I just simply marry for money. I would rather marry a poor girl who loves me than a rich snob who I would be miserable with when I ended up spending all of her money.
Love Snooki

A statement that I disagree with is, It is possible to fully get over someone you truly love. I disagree with this statment because when you "truly love" someone, those feelings that you have for that person don't just go away. In my opinion, you may be able to love someone else or have feelings for someone else, but you'll always have feelings for that one person. I have noticed that people get confused between being attracted to someone, and legitimately loving the person. Just because your attracted to someone, doesn't mean you love them. People get married, then five years latter get divorced. I think this is beacuse they wern't "truly in love" with eachother. They were just attracted to eachother, but it took that long for them to figure it out. If a couple were "truly in love" then got divorced for some strange reason, I do believe that they will loose feelings for eachother but no matter what, they will always have feelings for them in some way. Like I stated before, I don't think that it is possible to get over someone you truly love. But I do believe that it is possible to think you love someone, but get over them because you were just attracted to them.

True Love never Dies

When you find the one you love most in this world and you are sure of that love, it will never go away. I don't think it is possible to get over someone you love. I think it is possible to move one to someone else but still have the passtion for someone else still burning inside you. They will forever remain in your mind and and your heart because they left such an impretion on you. when you meet that one person in this world you Love and it leaves that kind of impression on you, i suggest you never let it go, because a love like that is so pressious and few to come by. I believe in true love and that it will never die out. You can move on all you want, but in the end your heart will still long for the one person that made you feel so specail and left a long lasting impression. No matter what age you are at there will always be that one person who got away and they will forever be burned into your memory and you heart for the rest of your life. you can never get away from the feeling of the one who got away, and if you have never loved someone before, the feeling is only the most wonderful thing in the world, to love is such a great thing, so i suggest you hold tight and stay with it.

True Love

The statement that is given is, "It is possible to fully get over someone you truly love." The word you have to take into great consideration in this statement is "truly." If you truly love someone there would be no way to get over them. If you truly love someone, that means that you believe that, that person is the only on for you in your life. No matter how much you try you will never stop thinking about that person, even if that person does not feel the same way about you, but you are too blinded by love to understand or accept that fact. You will be chained by this love for that one special person and you may never find the key to the lock binding those chains. This is the power of that "true" means. So as you have just read, you must understand that I believe that "true love" is one of the strongest statements you could use. This is a clear explanation to what I believe the answer should be. My answer is that it is impossible to simply "get over" your true love. As generic as what I have said may seem, I do strongly believe that it is the truth. Personally, I hate being the white knight when it comes to ideas such as love, because that's not so much the person I am. But I have told myself over and over again that if someone is willing to use the word "love", they damn well best mean it and not be using it on a common basis, for if it is used too commonly on multiple people, it will lose its purpose and become as weak as the word "like." So please, do use this term only when it is to be true and meaningful.

M0N3Y!

A lot of people say that they would marry someone for their money. But most people don't think into it very well. They don't realise that they will have to be with someone that they may hate, hate to be around, or etc. The money may be amazing to have but you still have the be around that person most of the time. After a while the money may not always be the best option in your choice. If I had to choose to marry someone for there money then I would say no. Because it may be fun to have tons of money and do what you want, but id rather be with someone I actually like and care for then some random person that all she has going for me is money. So items and money arn't always the best thing in life. Most people would love those but deep down inside I think they would rather have someone that they love and care for.

Bonus Blog The "Loving" feeling

The statement I want to talk about is number 4 "It is possivle to fully get over someone you truly love". I thought that this was a good one to pick because I beleive that you can get over someone you have loved but not fully their always still there. I think there is a perfectly good reason for this. I believe that when you date someone on top of all the feelings of romance and love your also making a close friend. After spending days and days with the significant other you start to depend on them as a friend. Although who's to say what love is its a diffrent expirence for everyone. Some people talk about it as something they share with their pets, or parents. Most people use it as something they share with a boy or girl, but noone can prove love therefore people can never know if they love something or someone I believe they just decide themselves if they are or are not in love.

Get Over It...

Apparently in the book The Great Gatsby the theme of getting over a loved one appears. The question here is wether or not you agree with the statement, "Is it possible to fully get over someone you truly love. I would say this statement is primarily untrue. Some people can forget those emotions and erase that person from their lives. Alot of people can't do that though. they take the heart break and use it to become a better person and find better relationships. Somewhere in their hearts they still have a small amount of feelings residing for that old love. Yet, they keep those feelings in line to help themselves stay involved and faithful to the current relationship. By using those feelings they become a better person. By pushing the old feelings away yet keeping control of them so they don't return to that old relationship. True love is hard to overcome so to be able to keep it controlled is very difficult. Yet once that feeling is kept in line it can turn into love for the new relationship and become much more intense.

Romance or Family

I agree that sometime it can be hard to choose between family and significant others. I believe that most people would choose their family but others arn't as close with their family members and would choose someone over them. If it were me I could easily connect with someone over my parents but not my brother. I would personaly take advice from my brother over any girl but as for my parents I might be not be able to side with them as well. Since im pretty close with my brother its easy for him to connect where as parents have a harder time getting it. To back up my opinion I think that sometimes parents dont know whats best for their kids. But others would disagree with me and say that parents are more imporant than any significant other I really think that it all depends on how close you are with your family members. Some people are close with their parents than any significant other or friend.

Romance or Family?

If I had to choose one, more deserves more loyalty, a family member or significant member, I would have to say a significant other. I choose this because I feel that if you are with a significant other, a husband or wife, you're with them for the sole purpose to please them and make them happy. A family member will always be there for you and respect and love you because they're your family, when sometimes a significant other will not be. Thats why it is more important to treat your significant other with more loyalty and respect because you want to keep them around longer, and cherish what you have.

In the case of who should be trusted more, I would still say that you should be able to trust a significant other to not make stupid decisions like cheating on you. A family member has already earned your trust and most likely always will unless they do something so drastic to change your opinion. But if you're with a significant other, husband or wife, they shoould have already earned your trust, and loyalty to be in the relationship in the first place. I believe that a family member should always be trusted, because they are part of your family, but a significant other should earn it. In a final statement, a significant other should recieve more loyalty and respect because you want to be in the relationship, so cherish them. PAYCE

<3>